Karl Theodor Jaspers
(born February 23, 1883 in Oldenburg, † 26 February 1969 in Basel) is
existentialism
The spirit of the free world an ambiguous picture. We are by no means politically free nations actually free! In the economic well-being, in the further slide in great excitement - this is not freedom! reduces the aristocracy of the discerning. The generated distribution of responsibility and irresponsibility democracy is the party oligarchy. What was the culture is widely bubble a Literatentums . The mind loses its seriousness.
why the people are not taken internally by the enormous threats that hover over them. At most they have even afraid that if it is once again went well (or endured) is, is quickly forgotten. A few feel it while with the freedom of the people the ways of her country and on earth and what threatens them. This seemingly well-being in the solid state can change suddenly if masses and intellectuals alike groundless become the material for total domination . If you already in a state of no longer grasped the outside have become free voluntarily to the servitude of the vanities of the world's faithless, then after a while the loss of "only" external freedom of the result.
It is as if in Germany the enormous noise of the mind and the political establishment, decades ago, in the twenties, the grave of his freedom had even dug, and as if today, from under happier life West Germany outside ago, but could be done from within the same thing again. But threaten the entire Western world is not the same dangers? Given the disaster the times for the freedom to obtain the fundamental objections in the Möchtigkeit of freedom a seducer weight. If political freedom is not a utopia? If it was not merely the spirit and fewer people within the West since the Greeks? And it is not rejected by most Westerners and the rest of humanity in blindness for them in practice? I would not deny the people who have known the political freedom and never ever produced. Have experienced in the metaphysical thinking, in poetry and art a depth that speaks to us wonderfully, I would not deny the size of rulers in China, India, in the most ancient cultures, and since the Sumerians . But it is across something that us if we seem him come inside close always surprised. Even in our spiritual Medieval us great personalities, their own barely conscious, so the more powerful encounter in their impression, but it is an experienced in the eerie abyss estrangement between us.
There are never personalities that we encounter but only where we wanted ethical freedom found or where it is painfully lacking. We can not rely on history as a process of creation of freedom, it was in the West since Jews and Greeks, since the polis and the Roman Republic, since the urban and rural middle age free, and the present of them coming forth altfreien European territories, political freedom in bold approaches, always amazing, because they emerge from the overwhelming amount of non-free human being, infinitely precious but vulnerable to the highest degree. Political freedom was produced only in small circle. She could also off, as in ancient Iceland a mental win, compared to Greek, Dutch, Anglo-Saxons while small but great reality. But everywhere it was soon lost.
The reality of the overwhelming majority of peoples and states is against freedom. These facts support the most serious objection: that freedom is impossible. For man was overwhelmed by it. The inescapable, although the Supreme encouraging but also the most exposed to danger situation for us, "the man is to be at the actual people will be free," which he seems in fact to a real person in the crowd of a people can not. For this argument one concludes: rule by unquestioned authority must be. She was always and everywhere. It will now give Russia and China, the majority in the world. The alternative of political freedom is in fact the violence of authority. The rule of a small minority of the great majority in the name of an authority to be recognized by all. Against the authoritarian rule state speaks invincible but the sentence: There are always people who rule over humans. Never is God, or the absolute truth in the world, there are always people only in the name of God, or in the name of absolute truth claim the authority, not God or the truth itself are just people, the violence in the service of authority to apply, not God or the truth. This authority is not deserving of belief, it is discredited in any of its forms through shameful, vile, evil acts. We are to us, does it show to my speech does not make it easy, as the freedom of course would be. Can we ever the phrase, "political freedom is inherent in the nature of man" maintained? Here it can not give a compelling insight of what is right. It is a decision being in mentality of the whole person, each with his political fate of companions. Standing in front of the alternative we have to know how we live. At what point, it is up to us, we want to create the future?
insight and determination to decide! They have become the philosophy to ourselves. The freedom is great, the destruction and possible, but without freedom is destruction indeed! The political freedom in the nobility of the indigenous people in accordance allowed hope. The other way is hopeless. We despise ourselves, if we abandon the courage of reason in which the hope is based. And if man should be swallowed up by the violence, it was certainly his truth but his path to freedom. It will not fail again, any more than the glory of the earth when it is once again dissolved in the ocean of the cosmos, as if she had not been.
Look:
The spirit of the free world is an ambiguous image.
Like everything in life, reveals the truth of freedom as Dual: freedom versa depending
Consider the course of history, the development of human freedom, our commitment to this truth but as a gift to the weighing down on the other hand the task of an adult, just as no one can live alone. Already it takes two to procreation and bringing these two a third show, a community, a family. The family was seen in all times as the nucleus of the States and the rules and authority are reflected in the family again in politics and in government systems. Humanity has made it different experiences: matriarchy, that supremacy of the wife and daughter. Patriarchy, that supremacy of the husband and son. Supremacy means authority. Authority need not be bad, it's the love, of justice, the sense of community, and at well-meaning efforts of the person who holds authority, if his rule is a good or bad. He respects the freedom, dignity and the right to Participation of individuals, then his authority will be recognized and he is gaining in size. Succeeds him (or her) not to win the recognition of family members, so the temptation is close with authority to cause violence and preserve it. We quickly realize that the authority of the force needed in reality is weakness, if sustained fatal in their afflictive tragedy.
The spirit of the free world is an ambiguous image.
Like everything in life, reveals the truth of freedom as Dual: freedom versa depending
Consider the course of history, the development of human freedom, our commitment to this truth but as a gift to the weighing down on the other hand the task of an adult, just as no one can live alone. Already it takes two to procreation and bringing these two a third show, a community, a family. The family was seen in all times as the nucleus of the States and the rules and authority are reflected in the family again in politics and in government systems. Humanity has made it different experiences: matriarchy, that supremacy of the wife and daughter. Patriarchy, that supremacy of the husband and son. Supremacy means authority. Authority need not be bad, it's the love, of justice, the sense of community, and at well-meaning efforts of the person who holds authority, if his rule is a good or bad. He respects the freedom, dignity and the right to Participation of individuals, then his authority will be recognized and he is gaining in size. Succeeds him (or her) not to win the recognition of family members, so the temptation is close with authority to cause violence and preserve it. We quickly realize that the authority of the force needed in reality is weakness, if sustained fatal in their afflictive tragedy.
The indigenous peoples we find the clearest political authoritarianism in the supremacy of the chiefs. In most cases, this supremacy carried by a council of elders, that is by people who had matured through the experience of life and of which it was hoped that they can muster enough foresight, tolerance, reason and love to take the benefit of all decisions. I think there is a link to aristocracy of discerning by Karl Jaspers speaks. It so clearly but an aristocracy, which the individual has to develop, mature leaves by life experience through reflection on the insight and knowledge. This worked as long as long as those who had the authority were willing to hand it in again when it became necessary, no later than by death. But in the vanity to see yourself in the size, get in to the temptation of power authority than do lies the danger! It Today nothing has changed to! Thus began the bloodline of the inherited authority! (The first kind of Genmanipulationsstrategie the breeding of the aristocracy was). Nobility was now no longer desirable for humans to recognize his generosity in his social position, but had become a hereditary aristocracy in power. From the political system of tribal mothers and fathers were tribal kings and queens, and so began the freedom of the peoples! Even where there were the kings and queens, well, strove with nobility and reason for the good of the people as the highest ideal of their reign was, but one division: The rulers and the people (the rulers and the ruled). Now, no longer had the individual human endeavor in its own community authority to seek, for it was hopeless! The common man yielded to his fate. Kings were born, so why should he make an effort and gain authority by insight?
power cries out for more power and so were the inheritance of nobility from small, manageable communities (tribal affiliation) and large international community and the Kings (Queens) were forced to divide the responsibility, because they will not only could carry.
power cries out for more power and so were the inheritance of nobility from small, manageable communities (tribal affiliation) and large international community and the Kings (Queens) were forced to divide the responsibility, because they will not only could carry.
Since we are back to saying Carl Jaspers produced the sharing of responsibility irresponsibility. A tribal elder, a king of a small kingdom had all the burden of responsibility on his shoulders. he fails, everybody knew that it was his failure and he had good or evil to face the consequences. He was a despot, he lost the love of his subjects. The distribution of responsibility created the hierarchy in its richest forms, with its many different ranks. Court and intrigue, all wrong game feigned favor to grab an advantage, lies, betrayal and all that we have just as policy began to know auszuformen in various structures of the monarchy led to the totalitarian and despotic military dictatorship of the inhuman regime of violence. All this was possible only through a distribution of responsibility, the same irresponsibility created.
And in the end, then no one's fault if the impoverished kingdom, the war went up in flames, or was broken up by corruption. But even worse than not found guilty, there was one, a single release of many with his small inner circle as a scapegoat in history for consideration. But it is precisely in this kind of history is taught is the truth and because we do not fathom the truth, not want to admit, we turn in a circle of hope and misfortune in the emergence and decline of the political cycle.
And in the end, then no one's fault if the impoverished kingdom, the war went up in flames, or was broken up by corruption. But even worse than not found guilty, there was one, a single release of many with his small inner circle as a scapegoat in history for consideration. But it is precisely in this kind of history is taught is the truth and because we do not fathom the truth, not want to admit, we turn in a circle of hope and misfortune in the emergence and decline of the political cycle.
just our recent past with the horrors of the Third Reich out the error in mind. Not Hitler alone with some aides committed the atrocities, but the sharing of responsibility and the deprivation of freedom and can thus be of the responsibility has, in need of the hour, people - fall below the belt of strength of character and good will - almost all men . let Most people in the camps did not die due to an execution order! No, most people died from starvation, disease, physical and psychological violence and cold that they grew out of the "hierarchy of shared responsibility." Because in bad times, every human being out of necessity itself the next, and so were all the freight cars with food and medicine, which was destined for Auschwitz or Buchenwald diverted, and in my own mouth, filled retained as a medium of exchange on the benefits of another kind swindle to or sold on the black market ... (These are mechanisms that we have not been overcome, we think of the corrupt administration of relief items, as aid reaching only a small part of the truly needy). Of course had not mitigate this responsibility to those rulers who have had - no, it increases it even at the level of truth, the posterity must be presented for inspection: the tyrants of history have not only made guilty by the commands that they grade - no its just as great if not greater blame lay in the fact that they gave instructions that they could not control himself! And slipping in any review of this command the spirits has released the all demolished in the abyss! (We also saw the war in Iraq, Afghanistan and even in prisons like Guantanamo). The hubris in the power of command is probably the very external authority, consecrating without internal protection mechanism in response to everything.
And I must note here that the appropriations for the European Union for the competence of the European Council powers concede, is also a dangerous Selbsterüberschätzung! The externalized externalized freedom and authority are a great risk by Carl Jaspers says that hovers over our apparent peace and apparent freedom.
This seemingly well-being in the solid state of freedom can change suddenly if masses and intellectuals become equally abysmal for the material for total domination . Yes, tilts the zeitgeist, that not only the power of the despotic ruler is to be feared, but the power of the spirits of malice and tyranny, who lived undetected until now in all men. The worst of tyranny is not the single tyrant (what power could have been a Hitler, a Mao Tse-tung, General Franco, Stalin, etc., without any assistants?) are but the tyrannical spirits, which are released and are externalized (weak) people without will follow in order to even the smallest environment great tyrants of the accident are. And in example of the European Union, has brought development still an incalculable additional threat, because the power is not even distributed in the hands of a man, or a close circle of people, no, it was where the responsibility on to the dance as initiated group of international organizations are not democratically elected leaders down to actually dance in a ring of irresponsibility! Because the laws can be designed so that while everyone who has access to the system (any part of the power structure) is its advantage to retrieve, but no one from outside the system, an access to a real responsible person or Politician, he could be called to account! This is a component that is new. because the tyranny of the unrecognized and not responsible withdrawing "experts" have created a form of externalized authority that Goethe's spirit is the same, as a lament:
This seemingly well-being in the solid state of freedom can change suddenly if masses and intellectuals become equally abysmal for the material for total domination . Yes, tilts the zeitgeist, that not only the power of the despotic ruler is to be feared, but the power of the spirits of malice and tyranny, who lived undetected until now in all men. The worst of tyranny is not the single tyrant (what power could have been a Hitler, a Mao Tse-tung, General Franco, Stalin, etc., without any assistants?) are but the tyrannical spirits, which are released and are externalized (weak) people without will follow in order to even the smallest environment great tyrants of the accident are. And in example of the European Union, has brought development still an incalculable additional threat, because the power is not even distributed in the hands of a man, or a close circle of people, no, it was where the responsibility on to the dance as initiated group of international organizations are not democratically elected leaders down to actually dance in a ring of irresponsibility! Because the laws can be designed so that while everyone who has access to the system (any part of the power structure) is its advantage to retrieve, but no one from outside the system, an access to a real responsible person or Politician, he could be called to account! This is a component that is new. because the tyranny of the unrecognized and not responsible withdrawing "experts" have created a form of externalized authority that Goethe's spirit is the same, as a lament:
"In the corner,
broom! Broom!
been s oath.
because as spirits
only Calls you, first to his purposes,
out the old master.
broom! Broom!
been s oath.
because as spirits
only Calls you, first to his purposes,
out the old master.
The I called the spirits, Shall I now can not get rid . "
But even today and certainly tomorrow are the architects of the European Union no longer the master, in command of the brooms! And the local government? Which have become yesterday's news of melts away ...
If you have not comprehended in the state of freedom has become external voluntarily goes into bondage to the vanities of the unbelieving world, then after a while the loss of "only" external freedom of the result. Voluntary servitude is done with the entry into the EU. It was not a step, no there were many steps by which the national governments have the responsibility schäubchenweise externalized and deported. With Maastrichvertrag 1992 Amsterdam Treaty 1999 Treaty of Nice
2003; Lisbon Treaty 2009, and now the Greek aid package with breach of bail-out clause (life ban, note) against democratic principles of freedom.
2003; Lisbon Treaty 2009, and now the Greek aid package with breach of bail-out clause (life ban, note) against democratic principles of freedom.
But why?
now to catch the sneaky type mice just bacon is interpreted and even bears are caught with honey, which they lick you. It is the seduction and greed for money, which acted as the best bait! The democratic freedom to lose, it just needs no tanks, no missiles, no, with only a pen and signature to understand on a set of paper that later, when you start to what is inside is actually so simple in these printed pages, with shivering recognizes that it emerges as a major contract the skilful subordination strategy than a dictatorial EU constitution! Yes, even worse, it is a world government agenda in the carousel of the elusive no more and no longer hold them to account would be "experts spirits and short-time politician," the international means of organization: UN, WHO, NATO, Council for Sustainable Development, WTO (World Trade Organization), IMF (International IMF to act), etc., like puppets in a blind frenzy of an illusion that lacks any reason, testing and soil stability! Not to mention ethical basis, whole and without any oversight - an open border of superlatives the lack of caution and a tear away all protective fences which the individual surrenders himself completely defenseless and in a corner of compulsive Total control and bondage drives of powerlessness, so masses and intellectuals alike groundless become the material for total domination.
Yes, even or precisely the intellectuals are blind to the strategy Glue gone. Why? Now considered the power of manipulative seduction just so as cosmopolitan and modern citizens cool to be a subtle Mainstream has produced, which is probably worse than the magnetism of the mob, the average age was followed by the Vandals of cruelty. The magnetism of the hidden agenda , the camouflaged and false flag sailing power of propaganda, the most colorful wallpaper for the prison of the mind-manipulation has served: All in the name of peace, security and the "sustainable development" to escape from all the dangers that (and were also stoked) wherever possible evoked praise for rescue packages of all kinds and lash to. But this "rescue packages" are actually the shackles and chains that bring people to the lines of the need to ensure their total dependence and submission.
Man is monitored in this more political European and global development of increasingly total! He loses his rights and his freedom, while the sacred cow of free market and unfettered global free financial transactions just claimed that freedom which would accrue to the people! One thing wrong is it and Karl Jaspers has seen it before when he said: The spirit of the free world is an ambiguous image.
GEICHHEIT FREEDOM BROTHERS (SISTERS) EFFICIENCY
The most significant milestone in the establishment of democracy was the French Revolution: liberty, equality, fraternity ( liberté , égalité, Fraternité ) the three pillars of civil liberty in the Declaration of Human Rights and Liberties (Déclaration des Droits de l' Homme et du Citoyen ) is one of the basic texts, in which 26 August 1789, the democracy and freedom in France were well founded.
Article 1
"Les hommes et demeurent libres et naissent Egaux en droits. Les distinctions sociales ne peuvent être que sur l'utilité commune fondées. "
People are born free and equal in rights and will remain so. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good.
Article 2
"Le but de toute association politique est la conservation des droits naturels et de l'homme imprescriptibles. Ces droits sont la liberté, la propriété, la sûreté et la résistance à l'oppression. "
The aim of every political association is the preservation of the natural and inalienable human rights. These are the right to liberty, the right to property, the right to security and the right to resist oppression.
Article 3
"Le principe de toute Souveraineté essential element reside dans la nation, nul corps, nul ne peut individual d'autorité qui n'en Exercens Emane expressément. "
of all sovereignty lies essentially in the Nation. No body and no individual may exercise any authority which does not emanate expressly from it.
Article 4
"La liberté consiste à faire tout ce qui ne nuit pas à autrui: ainsi l'exercice des droits naturels de chaque homme n'a de bornes que celles aux autres membres qui assurent de la société la jouissance de ces mêmes droits. Ces bornes ne peuvent . Déterminées être que par la loi "
The freedom is to do anything that does not harm others: the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no bounds, the other members of society benefit from securing the same rights. These limits can only be determined by the law.
Article 5
"La loi n'a le droit de les actions que défendre nuisible à la société. Tout ce qui n'est pas par la loi ne peut Défendu être empêché, et nul ne peut être contraint à faire ce qu'elle n'ordonne pas. "
The law can not prohibit only those acts which are harmful to society. Everything that is not prohibited by law, must not be prevented, and no one can be forced to do what does not command it.
Article 6
"La loi est l'expression de la volonté générale. Tous les citoyens ont droit de concourir personnelle ment, ou par leurs Représentants, à sa formation. Elle doit être la même pour tous, soit qu'elle protege, qu'elle soit punisse. Tous les citoyens, étant Egaux à ses yeux, sont également à toutes admissibles dignité, places et emplois publics, selon leurs capacités et sans autre distinction que celle de leurs vertus et de leurs talents. "
Law is the expression of general will. All citizens have the right to participate personally or through their representatives in its design. It must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens are equal before him, they are all alike, according to their abilities and without other distinction than that of their virtues and talents to all public Würden, Ämtern Stellungen und zugelassen.
Artikel 7
"No man can be accused, arrested or detained except in cases determined by law, and in the manner prescribed. one soliciting, transmitting, executing, or causing to be executed arbitrary orders, must be punished, but any citizen summoned or arrested under the law must obey immediately, he renders himself culpable by resistance. "
Niemand darf Angeklagter, verhaftet gefangengehalten oder werden, es sei denn in den durch das Gesetz bestimmten Fällen und nur in the forms prescribed by him. Who requires arbitrary orders, issues, carry out or can be punished, but any citizen summoned or arrested by law to obey, immediately, by resistance makes it an offense.
Article 8
"La loi ne doit établir que strictement of Peine et Evidemment nécessaires, et nul ne peut être puni qu'en vertu d'une loi et établi au promulguée antérieurement délit légalement et appliquée."
The Law must prescribe only the punishments that strictly and evidently necessary was, and no one may be punished as a result of a law adopted prior to the commission of the offense proclaimed and legally applied.
Article 9
"Tout homme étant jusqu'à ce qu'il ait Presume innocent été declare coupable, s'il juge est indispensable de l'arrêter, toute rigueur qui ne sera pas nécessaire pour s' personne doit être assurer de sa par la loi sévèrement réprimée. "
Since every man is presumed is presumed innocent until he was found guilty, must, for his arrest was inevitable will be held every hardship that is not necessary to secure his person severely curbed by Law.
Article 10
"Nul ne doit être pour ses Inquiets opinions, même religieuses, que leur manifestation ne trouble Pourvu pas l'ordre public établi par la loi."
No one should be prosecuted for his opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not interfere with the established Law and Order.
Article 11
"La libre communication of pensées et des opinions est un des droits de l'homme les plus Precious: tout citoyen peut donc parler, écrire, imprimer libremente, sauf à répondre de l'abus de cette liberté, dans les cas déterminé . par la loi "
The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious human rights, every citizen may, accordingly, speak, write and publish, subject to his responsibility for the abuse of this liberty in the due the cases specified by statute.
Article 12
"The guarantee of human rights and citizen necessitates a public force: this force is therefore instituted for the benefit of all and not for the benefit of those to whom it is entrusted. "
Die Menschen und der Gewährleistung Bürgerrechte erfordert eine öffentliche Gewalt, Gewalt ist diese zum Vorteil aussi go eingesetzt und nicht zum besonderen Nutzen Derer, Denen sie ist anvertraut.
Artikel 13
"For l'entretien de la force publique et pour les dépenses d'administration, une contribution commune est indispensable. . Elle doit être également Reparti entre tous les citoyens, en raison de leurs Facultés "
for the entertainment of the public authorities and for the administrative expenditure is a common contribution is essential and must on all citizens, in with their ability to be evenly distributed.
Article 14
"Chaque citoyen a le droit, par lui-même ou par ses Représentants, constat de la Nécessité de la contribution publique, de la libre consentir ment, d'en suivre l'emploi et d'en déterminer la quotite, l'assiette, le recouvrement et la durée. "
All citizens have the right to own or through their representatives, the need to establish a public tax, to consent freely to monitor their use and to determine its proportion, basis, collection and duration.
Article 15
"La société a le droit de demander compte à tout agent public de son administration. "
The Company has the right to ask a public official accountable for his administration.
Article 16
"Toute société dans laquelle la warranty ¹ est pas des droits n assurée, ni la séparation the pouvoirs déterminée, n'a pas de constitution."
A society in which the guaranteeing the rights of secured and not the separation of powers is not defined, has no constitution.
Article 17
"Les propriétés étant un droit inviolable et sacré, nul ne peut en être privé, si ce n'est lorsque la Nécessité publique, légalement constatée, l'exige Evidemment, et sous la condition d'une juste et Prealable indemnité.
the property is an inviolable and sacred right, since, no one may be taken, except that the legally established public necessity requires clear and just and prior compensation is determined.
The French Revolution has brought us the first declaration of human rights and the pillars of democracy created whereby the state power to secure the freedom and equality is divided into three branches:
legislation (legislative )
executive (executive)
law (judicial)
The separation of powers directed against concentration of power and arbitrariness in absolutism. The assurance begins with the words:
"From its birth, the people are and will remain free and equal in rights."
be guaranteed including property, security and the right to resist oppression, rule of law, religious expression and press freedom and popular sovereignty and separation of powers.
The middle class has defined its goals and achievements are free and they are in the most natural manner a flag that must be respected by the whole world. "The bourgeois individualism has so storers his public Magna Charter.
Olympe de Gouges
It should also be noted that the French writer and Rechtsphilosophin Olympe de Gouges, the Déclaration des droits 1791 de la femme et de la citoyenne ("Declaration of the Rights of Women and Women Citizens") published a further milestone in the modern set, in calling for the complete equality of women with men.
here and now, we are called to the citizens we internalize our freedom and our freedom right back to feed him with the power of our heart and carry it in the world with the courage to now us is required. For, as we shall see in the film, has formed behind us all back a new feudal Olegarchie to the majority of people exploit and oppress.
goods it is before the French Revolution, the clergy and nobility, who paid no taxes and the riches of the earth itself claimed, it is now the money aristocracy and the clergy of the lobbyists who are with absolute claim to power as the locusts eat through our countries, and states!
To paraphrase the words of the great political mastermind Karl Jaspers:
The freedom is great, the destruction and possible; without freedom, but the ruin is certain!
Political freedom in the nobility of the indigenous people referred, allowed hope.
The other way is hopeless.
We despise ourselves, if we abandon the courage of reason in which the hope is based. Let us find the nobility as nobility in ourselves and also politically steadfast into the world.
Karin EJ Kolland © Copyright of the text lies with Hanael books with soul Verlag, unchanged
free transfer is allowed to source information within the meaning of fairness and
democracy - www. hanael.at - www.intuitivesReiki.at - www.kuthumi.at
free transfer is allowed to source information within the meaning of fairness and
democracy - www. hanael.at - www.intuitivesReiki.at - www.kuthumi.at
