filed Europe No transfers petition to the German Bundestag
following public petition was filed today at the German Parliament --- and will be checked by the latter on adoption:
For your records
Public Petitions
at the
Bundestag Petitions Committee
Platz der Republik 1
Date: 12/19/2010
11011 Berlin read:
Sunday, December 19, 2010
The German Parliament is asked to decide that any final changes to the 
European contracts can be made without Europe-wide referendum detail exactly the 
We the undersigned are opposed to any changes in the European Treaty, by which the
"no bail-out clause" of Article 125 TFEU is bypassed.
others if we demand a commitment that Germany is leaving the European Union.Reason:
The reason I mention the cost of liability and obligation for the liabilities of other Member States, is as set out in Article 125 TFEU clear. Quote: Univ. Prof. Dr. Karl Albrecht Schachtschneider
The cost of liability and obligation for the liabilities of other member states in Article 125 FEU Treaty (Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) is clear. This is no bail-out clause is an essential component of
monetary union states that a stable community are based on own independent households. Condition is the budgetary discipline of all members of the FEU Treaty in Article 126 of monitoring and
an (entirely inappropriate) subject to disciplinary procedures. The Federal Constitutional Court has the
no bail-out clause in the Maastricht decision of 12 expected October 1993 (and others) on the concept of community stability and pronounced, the Germany of last resort could leave the union if the stability of the currency
was no longer guaranteed. This situation has occurred as expected. In the €-action of 12
January 1998, we had described this scenario. If Greece and the other members that are never
a monetary union with Germany but also Austria, the Netherlands and possibly the Scandinavians
stand up economically, namely other PIIGS (except Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal and
Spain), not to leave the monetary union, Germany is not only entitled but obliged to leave the Union 
. Any member may resign after the law of the monetary union. This follows from the
. Any member may resign after the law of the monetary union. This follows from the sovereignty of nations. In Germany, enjoining the stability principle of the Basic Law, which follows not only from the property
guarantee of Article 14 paragraph 1 GG, but also from the social principle and financial condition. End of quote.
| The welfare of the peoples of Europe depends on their freedom, their autonomy and their innovative creativity from the right and need care for your own personal use without interference from third parties, and without being dependent on other states. A complex world requires complex and not just monotone structures. Therefore YES to a free Europe as a community of sovereign nation states, no to the establishment of a supranational European state intergovernmental transfers. Sincerely Karin Erika Luise Johanna Kolland author, cosmologist, Chairwoman of the Association for the promotion of Hanael spiritual, intuitive and healthy lifestyles | |
| | |
| Constitution |
Gliederung.Artikel 20 (1) The Federal Republic of Germany is a democratic and social federal state.
(2) All state authority emanates from the people. It is by the people through elections and referendums and by specific
legislative, the executive power and exercised the jurisdiction. (3)
Legislation is subject to the constitutional order, the executive and the judiciary are bound by law and
law.
| against anyone who undertakes to abolish this constitutional order, have the right to all Germans resistance when no other remedy be possible. djure.org ) DOWNLOAD PDF of the petition application: http://www.kuthumi.at/uploads/petition-15822.pdf _____________________________________________________________________________ Even if a transfer Ausweiterung Union in Brussels last week was rejected in principle, but that the existing money by Contract Amendment from 2013, go into a transfer fund. Even if Merkel and Faymann now have resisted - but then a new clause to be regarded with great skepticism, because who knows who the 2013 power is in Brussels! I trust the EU politicians, because the break their word in no time again when it suits them! Therefore clear democratic binding legal certainty is necessary!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment